Wednesday, August 4, 2010

RHSV Information Technology and Historical Societies Survey 2010 (part 3)

Cataloguing programs used
  • Inmagic DB/TextWorks – 66
  • Excel – 37 *
  • Filemaker Pro – 18
  • Access – 18
  • Collections Mosaic – 6
  • Heritage V – 5
  • Microsoft Works – 5
Not using computers for cataloguing – 16
Other** – 15

Multiple responses to this question

*
13 groups reported using only Excel for collections management.

Excel was also used by groups using Inmagic DB/TextWorks (10), Access (10), Filemaker Pro (3), Collections Mosaic (2) and Microsoft Works (2)

**
  • Specially designed / in-house database – 5
  • Records directly added to library catalogue / database – 2
  • Tellico (Linux), Tabularium, eLibrary, Bookmark, Copernic and Tribute were other programs mentioned
Type of items in computer catalogue
  • Photographs – 125
  • Books – 106
  • Documents – 103
  • Maps – 73
  • Artifacts – 72
  • Ephemera – 70
  • Audio tapes – 53
  • Videotapes – 49
132 groups answered this question

Catalogue records made available to the public
  • Staff searching for researchers at the society – 125
  • Researchers using a read-only database at the society – 47
  • Researchers using a read-only version of the database at a library or another location – 4
  • Local history database available on the Internet – 25

2 comments:

Linda said...

This one is a bit of a concern, with only 72 of 135 who answered having artifacts catalogued - although does that mean 63 do not have any artifacts, only records material?

Vicki's Blog said...

Re the numbers of groups reporting not cataloguing artifacts - not all historical societies have museums. Many societies also start cataloguing the photographs and information items first.